ABC Audio has won three Edward R. Murrow Awards. In the “Continuing Coverage” category, it wins for “Start Here: Israel-Hamas War,” while “Reclaimed: The Forgotten League” takes honors for “Excellence in Writing.” In addition, “Start Here: On the Brink” is an award winner in the “News Documentary” category.
GROWING TREND: The practice of utilizing audio and video clips from other broadcasts as a talk media programming element to serve as segment thought-starters or guide posts to move things forward has been growing over the years and according to TALKERS research is now being regularly employed by a majority of online talk video and on-air talk radio hosts as a standard “format.” Described by TALKERS publisher Michael Harrison as “clip jockeys,” these hosts have, according to Harrison, “turned the practice of using what used to be described as a form of ‘actuality’ into the foundation of their programs.” This practice of using ‘clips’ is quite prevalent on YouTube where it has become regular fare – although radio hosts have been doing audio versions of it for years. Harrison continues, “The most widely-used sources of this ‘borrowed’ clipped material are FOX News Channel, CNN, MSNBC, and Newsmax among others including ‘legacy’ media operations.” “However,” Harrison adds, “even legacy network programs – especially late night talk shows – have begun utilizing the practice,” But is it legal infringment? Are clip jockeys and their platforms in violation of intellectual property rights? According to TALKERS VP/associate publisher and media attorney Matthew B. Harrison, “Broadcasters can share their online finds with their audience – and there is a public interest to allow for that – whether in the form of commentary, news, art, and instruction. But these same broadcasters need to be cognizant that if they are going to be presenting something that isn’t their own work, it needs to be done in a way that does not interfere with the originating platform’s or news organization’s ability to reap the rewards for their creation. Giving the audience the bulk of another’s creation, leaning on the goodwill of their talents for your own audience, does not usually lead to increased time spent viewing for the creator and in such a scenario those actions would be interfering with their ability to make a living and that goes against the spirit of fair use and the justification to share in the first place.”